Digital Humanities, Social Science and Cultural Preservation
About the Discourse on the Re-Search for a Fourth (Hyper-Spatial) Dimension of Smart Cities, Let Pose a Core Inquiry: Do the Systemic and Indicator-Based Frameworks of Smart City Entities Exhibit Greater Self Validation when Driven by their Historical and Contemporary Trajectories?
Abstract
Nicolae Bulz and Cristin Bigan
The rhetoric inquiry from the title of this co-authored study does not firmly follow a deterministic quasistatistically based trend (that would be suited for a ‘brighter-and-smarter’ nexus as the National Statistic Centers); i.e. caused mostly by the ‘absence’ of related data to the cohorts-populations of Smart Cities comparatively to the actual worldwide Metropolis. E.g. Is New York a Smart City? If partially-YES, then ‘Are the members of a respective Smart-Segment in the Metropolis interested/informed by an INDICATORIAL EVOLUTION from the PREVIOUS CITY – INDICATORIAL-ENTITIES to the New York Smart City’s RECENT INDICATORIAL-ENTITIES’? Or, have the New Yorkers fuzzy-indifference related to the existent ‘local asserted’ stance and/or related to the near future existent ‘Indicatorial Comparatively asserted’ stance?
Indifferent of the situation -but considering that the INDICATORIAL EVOLUTION is somehow assertedthen, it stands up a great-new COGNITIVE and PRAXIS-ACTIONAL context, and let the COMPARISONs effect to be open. Would all these influences, at least, to the LEADERSIP of the respective Smart City? I.e. {other plans/ programs; other objectives; other experts/other positions-jobs; other city-style; ‘originality’ …}!?! But it is possible that, also, some segments of population to be SUBTLE INFLUENCED too – and to appear SMART CITIZENSHIP’S (RE-)ACTIONS – more or less significant into the large Smart City’s life and adapted/changed management for a rational improved (re-)action versus these COMPARISONs / new type of smart-citadin data... / unexpected new types of city-style and ‘originality’ / …
Each line of this INDICATORIAL EVOLUTION must be on an EQUIVALENT SUITABLE BASIS FOR A COMPARISON: e.g. at a comparatively equivalent set of population – e.g. per 100,000 PREVIOUS CITIZENS versus an equivalent (possible more than) 100,000+ CURRENT CITIZENS.
This co-authored study is bordering a set of CONSTRUCTS-TENSIONS of a still possible INDICATORIAL EVOLUTION (ASCEND / STATIONARITY / DESCEND) per each ‘new’ SURVEY – i.e. evolutions from the CONTEMPORARY KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY towards a SMART CITY SOCIETY. Is this ‘last stage’ a facete of a CONSCIOUSNESS SOCIETY – or ‘fuzzy not yet’? If ‘not’, then ‘When and how would it be’? So, here and now, it is bordering the following set of INDICATORs for/towards: per 100,000 PREVIOUS/CURRENT CITIZENS the numeric data on: {Cybernetic Criminality / ‘Classical’ Criminality // Level of (e-)Education/Abandon/Illiteracy/(e-)Books Reading // Level of Happiness/Alienation / ActiveReactive Evolving Knowledge / Knowledge Usefulness at the Jobs Finding/Changing / Emigration/Immigration // Specific Level of Diversity / Genders-balance multi-ratio / Changed Sex // Marriages/Divorces/Separations // Level for Problematic-Childhoods // Problematic-Health --- mostly Depressions // Levels of (e-)Liberty/Prosecution // Levels of (e-)Administration // Levels of (e-)Peace-role …}